Michigan State University main website

Overspending on Defense Arsenal Bankrupts a Plant’s Economy


Michigan State University scientists may be close to finding out if plants can defend and grow at the same time. The research could help in understanding natural ecosystems or helping farmers increase yields without increasing dependence on chemicals to resist pests.

The lab of Gregg Howe at the MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory has genetically tuned a plant to become highly resistant to insect attacks. Becoming such a fortress compromises its growth and procreative capabilities. The research is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The findings seem to support a long-held paradigm called the growth-defense trade-off. Plants work with a fixed energy budget, so they prioritize resource usage depending on need. If they spend more energy on growth, their defenses are compromised. On the other hand, having more defense capabilities penalizes growth.

Plants, in nature, seem to follow this general rule. When stressed by drought, disease or insect pests, plants will mount defensive responses, which typically slows growth to a crawl. If plants have to grow fast, for example to compete with neighbors for light, their defenses are weakened.

“Our study provides evidence that large investments in defense necessarily reduce the amount of resources that otherwise would be available for growth and reproductive fitness,” said Qiang Guo, a graduate student in the Howe lab.

The study focuses on the defense system against herbivores, which depend on plants for shelter and food. If a caterpillar starts munching on a leaf, the system produces toxins that ward it off. In the absence of danger, the plant shuts down its defense system with a battery of 13 repressor proteins, called JAZ, that put the brakes on defense in order to save energy.

A former post-doc in the Howe lab, Yuki Yoshida, genetically bred a plant missing 10 of these 13 repressor proteins. The result was a plant in continuous, overdrive defense mode.

“It kept producing defense compounds, even in the absence of threats,” said Guo. “As expected, it showed high resistance to insects. Unleashing this defense arsenal also provided protection against fungi that target plant tissues.”

Strong plants without JAZ have slower growth rates compared to their wild type counterparts. The deficit in growth rate can be seen and measured per day.

The plants also have strongly compromised reproductive success. They produceone-third fewer seeds, and those seeds germinate later than usual. The seeds tend to be smaller and of lower quality, packed with less nutritional fats and with a different lipid make-up.

The team ruled out that photosynthesis – which is how plants obtain energy resources – was compromised.

 “The mutated plant gets the same amount of energy compounds from photosynthesis as its wild, natural counterpart,” said Ian Major, a post-doc in the Howe lab. “However, it consumes more energy than usual. We think the plant is fueling the massive and constant production of defense compounds, which draws resources away from growth.

Guo adds that the high-energy usage starves the plants of nutrients.

“It doesn’t have enough energy to perform other functions optimally, like growth,” Guo said. “To illustrate that point, we fed the plant with sugar, a fuel source, and it partially recovered its growth.”

“Our conclusion is that JAZ proteins help plants grow and reproduce by taming their defenses when the threat of attack is low, which conserves energy,” Major said. “Depending on the severity of the threat, the JAZ proteins will dial up the defenses as needed, perhaps like a dimmable light switch.”

The research team highlights the importance of Yoshida’s ten-year effort to knock out the JAZ proteins, one by one.

“He ignored a lot of us when we told him it was a high-risk, difficult project,” Major said. “Now we have new ways of thinking about plants and how we can combine plant traits in new and useful ways.”

Comments are closed.